Fifty-two infants were hospitalized with botulism in two outbreaks seven months apart. Forty-eight of them had been fed ByHeart Whole Nutrition powdered infant formula. Four had been fed Nara Organics Whole Milk Organic. The two products were made by different companies, on different continents, under different quality systems. Before 2025, the FDA says, no botulism outbreak had ever been tied to infant formula anywhere in the world since infant botulism was first described about fifty years ago. Then two happened back-to-back.

Whole genome sequencing has now tied them to each other, and both of them to one ingredient: organic whole milk powder brokered by Organic West Milk and spray dried by Dairy Farmers of America at its plant in Fallon, Nevada. That is the part of this record that matters most and has drawn the least attention.

The two outbreaks

CDC declared the ByHeart outbreak over on February 26, 2026: 48 infants — 28 confirmed and 20 probable — in seventeen states, all hospitalized, no deaths, with onsets from December 24, 2023 through November 29, 2025. It is the largest infant botulism outbreak ever documented in this country.

CDC declared the Nara Organics outbreak over on August 27, 2026: four confirmed cases in California (two), Pennsylvania and Washington, with onsets on April 20, May 17, May 20 and May 31, 2026. All four infants were hospitalized. Nara recalled all sixteen lots on the market on June 13, 2026, the day after FDA and CDC called on a Friday evening to say three babies were hospitalized.

What sequencing showed inside the ByHeart outbreak

FDA’s Human Foods Program sequenced 37 C. botulinum isolates from the ByHeart investigation — sixteen clinical and twenty-one from product — and sorted them into seventeen strains. Four of those strains connect infants directly to product or to ingredient. Two of them reach all the way back to the dryer:

Strain 11 links two FDA isolates from a Dairy Farmers of America milk powder retain, three ByHeart whole milk powder isolates, a ByHeart finished product isolate, an unopened can collected from an Arizona case household, and a New Jersey infant’s clinical isolate — all matching one another at a mean of 7.5 SNPs.

Strain 2 links a ByHeart finished product isolate from lot 251261P2, the lot most often reported by ill infants, to a second Dairy Farmers of America milk powder retain, at eight SNPs.

FDA collected 26 samples of its own and got two positives: a base mix retain from the Iowa plant that blends ByHeart’s powder, and a milk powder retain pulled at Dairy Farmers of America in Fallon. The New York State Wadsworth Center tested five samples and got two more — the unopened Arizona can, and a second Dairy Farmers of America retain. The agency’s own sampling put the outbreak organism in the dryer’s product.

The match that crossed brands

The finding that accompanied the Nara closeout on August 27 is the most consequential development in this record since ByHeart’s own outbreak was declared over.

FDA reported that sequencing of one clinical sample from a Nara infant matched a clinical sample from an infant in the 2025 ByHeart outbreak, a ByHeart powdered infant formula base sample, and four samples of unopened cans of ByHeart formula. CDC described the same result more generally: a patient sample from this outbreak linked to a patient sample, product samples and an ingredient sample from the ByHeart investigation. FDA then said outright that the matching sequencing results and the shared supply chain indicate a common source of contamination between the two outbreaks.

Read that match set again. Every counterpart in it is a ByHeart sample. A baby who never consumed a spoonful of ByHeart formula was colonized by a strain genetically indistinguishable from the one in ByHeart’s base powder and inside four sealed, unopened cans of ByHeart’s finished product.

Three things follow. Recovery of that organism from unopened cans forecloses any argument that contamination came from a home, a store, or a broken seal — it was in the product before the product left the manufacturer. The second outbreak is an independent check on causation that cannot be blamed on anything peculiar to one company’s plant, because the only route between those two infants is the dairy ingredient their formulas shared. And the persistence of one strain through that ingredient stream — across two manufacturers, across ByHeart’s entire recall, and across the closeout of ByHeart’s own outbreak — is the opposite of the isolated contamination a defendant needs to show.

Where the two chains meet

FDA’s internal incident record, obtained under FOIA, describes the ByHeart chain: liquid whole milk from twenty dairies is delivered to Dairy Farmers of America in Fallon, where it is spray dried into organic whole milk powder; Organic West Milk, acting as broker, ships that powder by third-party carrier to the Iowa blender that makes ByHeart’s base mix.

Nara’s own account of its supply chain puts it in the same position. From October 2024 to April 2025 Nara bought whole milk from Organic West, dried at Dairy Farmers of America in Nevada. That powder went into formula Nara made in Germany and sold here through Target stores, Target.com and Nara.com from July 2025 until the recall. CDC’s closeout states the traceback more broadly than FDA did in June: the formulas sold by both brands — not just the Nara lots tied to illness — were made with that milk and dried by that processor.

How the second outbreak was allowed to happen

During the ByHeart investigation, Organic West Milk gave FDA a customer list that failed to disclose that its milk was also going to the maker of Nara formula. On January 28 and February 3, 2026, FDA’s outbreak response network sent traceability assignments to six firms that had received Organic West lots of milk powder testing positive for C. botulinum, asking for all distribution of that powder to infant formula manufacturers over the prior two years. The result, in FDA’s words: none of the firms identified any infant formula manufacturers as customers that were supplied whole milk powder. Nara formula had been on sale for six months at that point. The first Nara infant got sick about eight weeks after the last assignment closed.

Nara was not in the dark. In late January 2026 the Associated Press publicly identified Organic West Milk and the Fallon plant as the source of the botulism-positive powder in the ByHeart outbreak — and quoted Dairy Farmers of America saying its powder met all required tests. Nara has acknowledged learning from those reports in early 2026 that it shared suppliers with ByHeart. By its own description it reviewed its lots, looked at its sulfite-reducing clostridia results, and left the formula on the market. Four babies were hospitalized over the following four months.

That indicator testing is the testing that failed. The FAO/WHO expert group that met in Rome in June 2026 concluded that hygiene indicators do not replace pathogen-specific testing, and the published analysis of ByHeart product found C. botulinum in finished formula and base powder where the usual indicator organism was non-detectable. Both companies in this chain pointed to their tests as proof of safety. The tests were the problem.

What sequencing settles, and what it doesn’t

FDA has not announced a root cause, and it cannot yet say whether the milk was contaminated before drying or during drying. Its preventive controls inspection at Dairy Farmers of America found no objectionable conditions, and its inspections of ByHeart’s plants turned up nothing that explains the outbreak.

Those are limits on origin, not on defect. Whether spores entered the milk on a farm, in a tanker, or in the dryer bears on how responsibility is apportioned among these companies, not on the condition of what was sold. The powder that left Fallon carried viable C. botulinum, and sequencing put that organism in two brands of finished formula and in sick infants in both outbreaks. A component manufacturer whose component is itself defective is liable for the harm the defect causes once the component is built into the finished product, and the broker who sold that powder into commerce stands where any other commercial seller stands. FDA told the whole industry as much in its July 13, 2026 letter: responsibility for safety extends to every ingredient, every supplier, and every link in the supply chain.

Two loose ends remain, and they are our first discovery requests. FDA reported on July 6 that C. botulinumhad been recovered from an open can of Nara formula fed to one of the sick infants, and that an unopened can from the same lot was being tested. Neither closeout reports that result, and no Nara product or ingredient sample is reported to have matched anything. Every counterpart in the cross-brand match is on the ByHeart side of the ledger. I would like to know why.

Nara Organics posted an update on August 27, 2026, the same day the Food and Drug Administration and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention declared the infant botulism outbreak linked to its Whole Milk Organic Infant Formula over, saying it plans to bring the formula back to U.S. shelves with European dairy and what it calls rigorous Clostridium botulinum testing. Four infants in California, Pennsylvania and Washington were hospitalized with botulism after drinking the formula in April and May 2026. All four survived. The formula was recalled June 13, 2026.

FDA and CDC say the formula was contaminated and made the babies sick.

This is not a case of a company recalling out of caution. CDC’s closing statement says epidemiologic, traceback and laboratory data showed that Nara Organics Whole Milk Organic Infant Formula was contaminated and made infants sick, and that the data indicate a common source of contamination for this outbreak and the 2025 outbreak linked to ByHeart Whole Nutrition Infant Formula. FDA’s page goes further: whole genome sequencing matched a Nara patient’s bacteria to a ByHeart patient, to a ByHeart base powder sample, and to four sealed, unopened cans of ByHeart formula. The ByHeart outbreak hospitalized 48 infants in seventeen states. Between the two brands, 52 babies were hospitalized with a disease that paralyzes.

The two brands shared a milk supplier and a spray dryer, and nobody has found the root cause.

Both formulas were made with milk from Organic West Milk that was spray dried by Dairy Farmers of America. That is the common source both agencies point to. What neither agency can say is whether the milk was contaminated before it reached the dryer or during drying. Nara’s update says its outbreak may be linked to one of its former dairy suppliers, the same suppliers as ByHeart’s. That is a careful way of describing a finding the government stated plainly. I went through the update line by line on Marler Blog and set what Nara wrote next to what FDA wrote.

Negative toxin tests on sealed cans do not tell you the powder is free of spores.

Nara says every test on sealed cans of its formula came back negative for C. botulinum toxin type A and type B. Parents should understand what that does and does not mean. Powdered formula does not carry botulism toxin. It carries spores, which are dormant, scattered unevenly through the powder, and harmless to older children and adults. Infant botulism happens when a baby swallows spores, the spores germinate in a gut whose bacteria are not yet developed enough to stop them, and the toxin is made inside the baby. A can may test negative for toxin and still contain the spores that put a child in the hospital. In the ByHeart outbreak FDA found the organism itself in the product and in the milk powder that went into it. A relaunch built on toxin testing is testing for the wrong thing.

The signs of infant botulism come on slowly and can take weeks.

The first sign is usually constipation, followed by poor feeding, a weak cry that sounds different from normal, drooping eyelids, a face that shows less expression than usual, pupils slow to react to light, and a loss of head control that parents describe as the baby going floppy. CDC warns that symptoms can take as long as several weeks to develop after a baby eats contaminated formula. Any infant who ate the recalled Nara formula, or any formula, and shows these signs needs to be seen immediately. Infant botulism is treatable with an antitoxin called BabyBIG, and the earlier it is given the shorter the hospital stay.

What to do now.

If you still have Nara Organics Whole Milk Organic Infant Formula from before the recall, do not use it; CDC says to throw away unopened cans and leftover product. If a relaunched Nara product reaches shelves, the questions worth asking before buying are simple ones: where the milk came from, who dried it, and whether the company tests the powder for the organism rather than the toxin. Nara says its newest batches use European dairy and were not part of the recall. The update does not say how that testing is done. Families of two of the four Nara infants have filed suit, and the earlier coverage of this outbreak on this blog is here, with the ByHeart outbreak here.

Three questions parents are asking.

Is Nara formula safe now? The recalled formula is not. FDA and CDC concluded it was contaminated and made four infants sick. Nara says future batches will use European dairy and toxin testing; the update does not say whether FDA has reviewed the change, and the root cause of the contamination in both the Nara and ByHeart outbreaks has not been found.

What are the first symptoms of infant botulism? Constipation, poor feeding, a weak or changed cry, drooping eyelids and loss of head control. Symptoms can appear weeks after the formula was eaten. Seek care immediately.

Was Nara formula linked to the ByHeart outbreak? Yes. FDA matched a Nara patient’s Clostridium botulinum by whole genome sequencing to a ByHeart patient and to unopened ByHeart cans, and both agencies say the two outbreaks share a common source: milk from the same supplier, dried by the same facility.

Botulism is a rare, life-threatening paralytic illness caused by neurotoxins produced by an anaerobic, gram-positive, spore-forming bacterium, Clostridium botulinum.[1] Unlike Clostridium perfringens, which requires the ingestion of large numbers of viable cells to cause symptoms, the symptoms of botulism are caused by the ingestion of highly toxic, soluble exotoxins produced by C. botulinum while growing in foods.[2] These rod-shaped bacteria grow best under anaerobic (or, low oxygen), low-salt, and low-acid conditions.[3] Bacterial growth is inhibited by refrigeration below 4° C., heating above 121° C, and high water-activity or acidity.[4] And although the toxin is destroyed by heating to 85° C. for at least five minutes, the spores formed by the bacteria are not inactivated unless the food is heated under high pressure to 121° C. for at least twenty minutes.[5]

Botulinum neurotoxin is one of the most lethal biological substances known.[6] While the bacteria themselves are usually harmless, the toxin they create attacks the nervous system and causes botulism, a severe paralytic illness.

C. botulinum bacteria and spores are widely distributed in nature, because they are indigenous to soils and waters.[7] They occur in both cultivated and forest soils, bottom sediment of streams, lakes, and coastal waters, in the intestinal tracts of fish and mammals, and in the gills and viscera of crabs and other shellfish.[8]

The incidence of foodborne botulism is extremely low. On average, roughly 145 cases of botulism of all types are reported in the United States each year; of these, about 65% are infant botulism (the most common form), about 20% are wound botulism, and about 15% are foodborne (CDC).[9] Nonetheless, the extreme danger posed by the bacteria has required that “intensive surveillance is maintained for botulism cases in the United States, and every case is treated as a public health emergency.”[10] This danger includes a historical mortality rate of up to 65% when victims are not treated immediately and properly, although with prompt antitoxin and modern intensive-care support the case-fatality rate is now low—on the order of a few percent.[11] Most of the botulism events[12] that are reported annually in the United States are associated with home-canned foods that have not been safely processed.[13] Occasionally, though, commercially-processed foods are implicated as the source of botulism events, including sausages, beef stew, canned vegetables, and seafood products.[14] More recent commercial vehicles have included a nacho-cheese sauce implicated in a 2017 outbreak in California. Separately, ingested spores—classically from honey and, in a 2025 multistate outbreak, from a powdered infant formula—have been linked to infant botulism, in which the spores germinate and produce toxin in an infant’s immature intestinal tract (CDC).

TYPES OF BOTULISM

    Botulism is generally classified into several distinct forms, which differ chiefly in how the toxin comes to be present in the body:

    • Foodborne:  Caused by eating foods contaminated with the toxin, often from improper home-canning or poorly preserved foods.
    • Infant:  Occurs when babies (under one year old) ingest the bacterial spores, which then germinate and produce toxins in the gut.  This is why honey should never be fed to infants.
    • Wound:  Happens when C. botulinum spores infect a cut or wound and produce toxins, commonly associated with the use of contaminated injection drugs.
    • Iatrogenic:  A rare type that occurs if too much botulinum toxin is injected for cosmetic purposes (like wrinkle reduction) or medical conditions (such as migraine).
    • Adult Intestinal Toxemia:  An extremely rare condition in older children and adults where spores colonize the intestinal tract and produce toxin (similar to infant botulism).

    WHERE DOES CLOSTRIDIUM BOTULINUM COME FROM?

      Soil and Sediment: The Ultimate Natural Reservoir.  Landmark environmental surveys dating back over a century have established that viable C. botulinum spores reside in ground soils, dust, and aquatic sediments across every continent where they have been sought.  The distribution of specific toxin types in infant botulism cases typically reflects the geographic prevalence of those strains in the local soil.  For example, in the United States, Type A spores are predominantly found in the western states, while Type B spores are more densely concentrated in the eastern and mid-Atlantic states.

      Airborne Dust and Environmental Displacement.  Because spores are highly resistant to environmental stressors (such as drying, heat, and UV light), they easily become airborne.  Presently, dust inhalation or ingestion is considered a primary, unavoidable exposure route.[15]  Epidemiological data significantly associates infant botulism cases with residence in windy or dusty locations, as well as proximity to dust-generating activities.

      Honey: The Primary Identifiable and Avoidable Food Source.  While environmental exposure is largely unpreventable, honey is universally recognized as the single most significant, avoidable foodborne vehicle for C. botulinum spores.[16]  C. botulinum is not a disease of the honeybee.  Instead, honey becomes an accidental repository when bees carry environmental dust, water, or pollen contaminated with spores back to the hive.[17]  Because honey is typically consumed raw (unpasteurized and non-irradiated), and because bacterial spores are uniquely structurally adapted to survive low-moisture environments, the dormant spores remain viable inside the honey matrix indefinitely.  Globally, about 4% of retail honey specimens test positive for Clostridium botulinum spores, though regional rates vary widely. While some localized surveys find no spores, others report contamination rates as high as 10% to 20% depending on the source and processing methods.[18]

      INFANT BOTULISM

        Infant botulism is a rare but serious paralytic illness of babies, usually affecting infants younger than one year.  It is caused when an infant swallows spores of Clostridium botulinum, or rarely related toxin-producing Clostridiumspecies, and those spores survive, germinate, and multiply in the immature intestine.  The bacteria then produce botulinum neurotoxin inside the infant’s gut.  In plain terms, the baby does not simply ingest a “germ”; the infant’s bowel becomes the place where the toxin is made.[19][20]

        That mechanism is what separates infant botulism from classic foodborne botulism.  In foodborne botulism, a child or adult typically swallows toxin that has already formed in contaminated food.  In infant botulism, the infant swallows spores, and the toxin is produced after the spores colonize the intestine.  Infants are uniquely vulnerable because their gut microbiome, bile-acid profile, immune defenses, and intestinal motility are still developing, and they do not yet have the mature protective intestinal flora that usually prevent C. botulinum spores from gaining a foothold in older children and adults.[21][22]  Approximately 95% of cases occur in infants under six months of age, with a median age of around three months.  Most cases are caused by toxin type A or type B.[23]  Because they are so common, in many individual cases the exact source is never identified.[24]

        SYMPTOMS OF BOTULISM

        After their ingestion, botulinum neurotoxins are absorbed primarily in the duodenum and jejunum, pass into the bloodstream, and travel to synapses in the nervous system.[25] There, the neurotoxins cause flaccid paralysis by preventing the release of acetylcholine, a neurotransmitter, at neuromuscular junctions, thereby preventing motor-fiber stimulation.[26] The flaccid paralysis progresses symmetrically downward, usually beginning with the eyes and face before moving to the throat, chest, and extremities.[27] When the diaphragm and chest muscles become fully involved, respiration is inhibited and, unless the patient is ventilated, death from asphyxia results.[28]

        Classic symptoms of botulism include nausea, vomiting, fatigue, dizziness, double vision, drooping eyelids, slurred speech, difficulty swallowing, dryness of skin, mouth, and throat, lack of fever, muscle weakness, and paralysis.[29]  Throughout all such symptoms, the victims are fully alert, and the results of sensory examination are normal.[30]

        In foodborne botulism cases, symptoms usually begin anywhere between 12 and 72 hours after the ingestion of toxin-containing food.[31]  Longer incubation periods—up to 10 days—are not unknown, however.  The duration of the illness is from 1 to 10 (or more) days, depending on host-resistance, the amount of toxin ingested, and other factors.[32]  Full recovery often takes from weeks to months.[33] And, as earlier indicated, mortality rate can be from 30% to 65%, with rates generally lower in European countries than in the United States.[34]

        Signs and Symptoms in Infants

        Infant botulism often begins subtly and then progresses over hours to days.  Constipation is commonly one of the earliest signs, followed by poor feeding, weak suck, weak or altered cry, drooping eyelids, diminished facial expression, reduced gag reflex, poor head control, generalized hypotonia, lethargy, and respiratory difficulty.  CDC’s clinical overview specifically lists constipation, poor feeding, ptosis, sluggish pupils, flattened facial expression, diminished suck and gag reflexes, weak or altered cry, and respiratory difficulty or arrest as typical findings.[35]  Common signs include:

        • Constipation, often for several days;
        • Poor feeding, with weak sucking and swallowing;
        • A weak, altered, or soft cry;
        • Drooping eyelids (ptosis), sluggish pupils, and reduced eye movement;
        • Generalized weakness and low muscle tone—the classic “floppy baby”;
        • Lethargy and a diminished gag reflex; and
        • Breathing difficulty, progressing in severe cases to respiratory failure—the most dangerous complication.

        Because these early signs mimic more common conditions, a high index of suspicion matters.  A baby with poor feeding, a weak cry, and increasing floppiness—especially with any breathing difficulty—needs urgent evaluation.[36]

        Botulism in Older Children and Adults

        The same toxin can cause serious illness in older children and adults, but the exposure pattern is different.  Foodborne botulism occurs when a person eats food in which toxin has already formed, classically improperly canned, preserved, fermented, or stored low-acid foods.  Wound botulism occurs when spores contaminate a wound and produce toxin in devitalized tissue; in modern U.S. practice, this is often associated with injection-drug use.  Iatrogenic botulism can occur after excessive or improperly administered therapeutic or cosmetic botulinum toxin.  Adult intestinal colonization botulism is rare but can occur when the adult gut is altered by surgery, antibiotics, bowel disease, or other disruptions.[37][38]

        In non-infant botulism, symptoms often begin with cranial nerve findings such as blurred or double vision, drooping eyelids, slurred speech, difficulty swallowing, dry mouth, and facial weakness.  Weakness then typically descends symmetrically from the face and neck to the arms, trunk, and legs.  Patients are usually awake and afebrile, and sensation is usually preserved, which can make the paralysis especially frightening.  Severe cases require intubation and mechanical ventilation.  Id.

        DETECTION AND DIAGNOSIS

        Although botulism can be diagnosed based on clinical symptoms, its differentiation from other diseases is often difficult—especially in the absence of other known persons affected by the condition.[39] Once suspected, the most direct and effective way to confirm the diagnosis of botulism in the laboratory is testing for the presence of the botulinum toxin in the serum, stool, or gastric secretions of the patient.[40] The food consumed by the patient can also be tested for the presence of toxins.[41] The mouse bioassay (mouse neutralization test), which involves injecting serum into mice and observing for signs of botulism, remains the standard confirmatory laboratory method, although public health laboratories increasingly supplement it with faster molecular and mass-spectrometry–based assays.[42] This test typically takes 48 hours, while the direct culturing of specimens takes 5-7 days.[43] Some cases of botulism may go undiagnosed because symptoms are transient or mild, or are misdiagnosed as Guillain-Barré syndrome.[44]

        Botulism is first and foremost a clinical diagnosis.  Laboratory confirmation is important, but treatment should not wait for test results when the clinical picture is concerning.  CDC’s 2021 clinical guidelines emphasize that timely diagnosis is crucial because antitoxin is the only specific therapy and should be administered as quickly as possible. Because the antitoxin works best when given early, clinicians treat as soon as infant botulism is reasonably suspected.[45]

        For infants, definitive testing usually requires stool or enema specimens, which can be tested for botulinum toxin and cultured for C. botulinum.  Testing is specialized and is generally coordinated through state public health laboratories, CDC, and the California Department of Public Health Infant Botulism Treatment and Prevention Program.  CDC advises that this specialized testing often takes days and that clinicians should not delay BabyBIG treatment while awaiting confirmation.[46]

        In outbreak investigations, public health laboratories may also test leftover foods, unopened products, ingredients, environmental samples, and bacterial isolates from patients.  Whole-genome sequencing can compare isolates from patients, products, and ingredients to determine whether they are genetically related.  In the ByHeart outbreak, that genetic comparison was central because isolates from clinical samples, finished formula, base mix, and organic whole milk powder clustered together.[47][48]

        TREATMENT

        If diagnosed early, foodborne botulism can be treated with botulinum antitoxin, which blocks the action of toxin still circulating in the blood; in the United States, adult and older-child cases are treated with heptavalent botulinum antitoxin (HBAT), while infant botulism is treated with human botulism immune globulin (BabyBIG).[49] This can prevent patients from worsening, but recovery still takes many weeks.[50] The mainstay of therapy is supportive treatment in intensive care, and mechanical ventilation in case of respiratory failure, which is common.[51]

        Infant botulism is highly treatable, and the great majority of babies recover fully.  Care rests on two pillars: specific antitoxin and supportive care.[52]  Treatment has two parts: neutralizing circulating toxin and supporting the patient while nerves recover.  For infants, the specific treatment is human botulism immune globulin intravenous, known as BIG-IV or BabyBIG.  BabyBIG is FDA-approved for infant botulism types A and B and is obtained in the United States through the Infant Botulism Treatment and Prevention Program.  The treating physician contacts the program for immediate consultation; if the presentation supports infant botulism, BabyBIG is released and treatment begins without waiting for final laboratory confirmation.[53][54]

        The evidence for BabyBIG is strong.  In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled California trial of 122 infants with laboratory-confirmed infant botulism, treatment within three days of hospital admission reduced mean hospital stay from 5.7 weeks to 2.6 weeks.  It also reduced ICU time, mechanical ventilation time, tube or intravenous feeding time, and hospital charges.  In plain language, BabyBIG does not instantly make the baby well, but it stops additional circulating toxin from binding and can substantially shorten the illness.[55]

        Supportive care is equally important.  Infants may need close ICU monitoring, respiratory support, mechanical ventilation, suctioning, prevention of aspiration, nutritional support through nasogastric or other tube feeding, bowel care, occupational therapy, feeding therapy, physical therapy, and careful discharge planning.  Antibiotics are generally not used to treat infant botulism itself because bacterial killing in the gut may increase toxin release; aminoglycosides and certain other medications that impair neuromuscular transmission are avoided because they can worsen weakness.[56]

        For older children and adults with suspected foodborne, wound, or other non-infant botulism, the specific antitoxin is generally heptavalent botulinum antitoxin, obtained through public health authorities and CDC.  As with infants, antitoxin should be given as early as possible, because it neutralizes toxin that has not yet bound to nerves.  Wound botulism also requires wound evaluation and debridement, and antibiotics may be used for wound infection after antitoxin decisions are addressed.[57][58]

        PROGNOSIS, RECOVERY, AND LONG-TERM INJURY

        Although a minority of botulism patients eventually recover their pre-infection health, the majority do not. For those who fully recover, the greatest improvement in muscle strength occurs in the first three months after the acute phase of illness.[59] The outside limit for such improvement appears, however, to be one year.[60] Consequently, physical limitations that still exist beyond the one-year mark are more probably than not permanent. Recovery from acute botulism symptoms may also be followed by persistent psychological dysfunction that may require intervention.[61]

        According to a recently published study that tracked the long-term outcomes of 217 cases of botulism, a large majority of patients reported “significant health, functional, and psychosocial limitations that are likely the consequences of the illness.”[62] These limitations included: fatigue, weakness, dizziness, dry mouth, and difficulty lifting things. The victims also reported difficulty breathing caused by moderate exertions, such as walking or lifting heavy items. They were also more likely to have limitations in vigorous activities, like running or playing sports, climbing up three flights of stairs, or carrying groceries. Summarizing its finding, the study concluded that: 

        Even several years after acute illness, patients who had botulism were more likely than control subjects to experience fatigue, generalized weakness, dizziness, dry mouth, difficulty lifting things, and difficulty breathing caused by moderate exertion…. In addition, patients…reported worse overall psycho-social status than did control subjects, with patients being significantly less likely to report feeling happy, calm, and peaceful, or full of pep.[63]

        There is, as a result, no question that the damaging effects of botulism are life-long.

        Infant Prognosis and Complications

        With prompt recognition, BabyBIG, and modern intensive care, most infants survive and recover.  That favorable long-term prognosis, however, should not obscure the severity of the acute illness, which is frightening, often protracted, and frequently requires weeks of intensive hospital care.  The recognized complications include:

        • Respiratory failure, apnea, and aspiration—the principal reason a ventilator may be required (on average roughly three weeks when needed);
        • Prolonged feeding difficulty—safe oral feeding can take many weeks to return;
        • Autonomic effects such as urinary retention, and secondary infections (e.g., pneumonia, ear infection) acquired in the hospital;
        • Prolonged general weakness during recovery.[64][65][66]

        A baby with infant botulism may spend days to weeks unable to feed safely, protect the airway, or breathe without support.  Families may experience a prolonged hospitalization, transfer to a tertiary children’s hospital, repeated testing, feeding-tube dependence, ventilator care, and months of follow-up.[67]  In the 2025 ByHeart-formula outbreak, CDC EIS preliminary data found that approximately two-thirds of evaluated infants required post-hospitalization physical therapy or feeding support.[68]  Reasonable follow-up commonly includes primary care, neurology as needed, feeding or speech therapy, physical and occupational therapy, nutrition monitoring, developmental surveillance, and assessment for residual weakness, dysphagia, oral aversion, motor delay, or caregiver trauma.  Id.  Lasting neurological after-effects are seldom seen, and most infants regain normal strength and development; severe long-term harm is rare.  Follow-up with neurology and physiotherapy is advisable after a severe episode.[69]

        PREVENTION

          Because Clostridium botulinum spores are ubiquitous in the environment, botulism can never be eliminated entirely; the practical goal is to prevent the conditions that let the spores germinate and produce toxin, or that let the toxin reach a susceptible person.  The most effective measures differ sharply by the form of the disease.  Foodborne botulism is, in principle, almost entirely preventable through proper food processing and handling.  Infant and adult intestinal botulism are far less preventable, because they arise from environmental spores that cannot practicably be avoided.  Wound and iatrogenic botulism are prevented by addressing their specific exposures.[70]

          Foodborne Botulism: Safe Home Canning and Food Handling.

          The single most important safeguard against foodborne botulism is proper home canning.  Low-acid foods—including all vegetables, meats, poultry, fish, and seafood—must be processed in a pressure canner, the only method that reaches 240° F (116° C), the temperature required to destroy C. botulinum spores; a boiling-water bath, which tops out at 212° F, is adequate only for high-acid foods such as most fruits, pickles, and properly acidified tomatoes.[71]  As an added precaution, home-canned and other low-acid foods can be boiled for ten minutes before serving to inactivate any toxin that may be present.  Bulging, leaking, cracked, or foul-smelling containers should be discarded without tasting, because even a taste of contaminated food can be fatal and the toxin is frequently present without any visible sign of spoilage.  Several everyday household sources warrant particular care: oils infused with garlic or herbs should be refrigerated and discarded within a few days; potatoes baked in foil should be kept hot or refrigerated rather than held at room temperature; and home-fermented foods and prison-made “pruno” should be avoided.[72]

          Commercially Processed Foods.

          Commercially canned and packaged foods rarely cause botulism because federal regulation requires validated thermal processing.  Manufacturers of low-acid and acidified canned foods must register with the FDA and follow mandatory process controls—including the thermal “botulinum cook”—under 21 C.F.R. Parts 113 and 114, and the outbreaks that are occasionally traced to commercial products (historically sausages and canned vegetables, and more recently a commercially distributed nacho-cheese sauce) typically prompt immediate recalls.[73]

          Infant Botulism: Honey Avoidance and the Limits of Prevention.

          For infants, the one clearly identified and avoidable dietary source of C. botulinum spores is honey.  The CDC and the American Academy of Pediatrics advise that honey never be given—in any form, including a taste on a pacifier or nipple, or in processed products made with honey—to a child younger than twelve months.[74]  That guidance carries an important caveat: most infant botulism today is caused not by honey but by the inhalation or ingestion of microscopic environmental dust on which the spores travel, an exposure that cannot practicably be prevented.  Honey avoidance therefore addresses only a minority of cases and cannot eliminate the disease.  Breastfeeding is not a risk—botulinum toxin is not transmitted in breast milk—and a mother who has eaten honey may safely continue to nurse.[75]

          Powdered Infant Formula.

          Powdered infant formula warrants separate mention.  Unlike liquid formula, which is heat-treated and sealed to be commercially sterile, powdered formula is not sterile and can carry environmental contaminants introduced during manufacturing.  In the 2025–2026 outbreak associated with ByHeart formula—the first botulism outbreak ever tied to infant formula anywhere in the world—the FDA and the manufacturer focused their investigation on spores that can enter a production facility from soil and dust carried on hands, shoes, and other surfaces.[76]  Prevention of formula-borne botulism therefore rests principally on the manufacturer and the regulatory system—rigorous environmental monitoring, sanitary controls, and finished-product and ingredient testing—rather than on any step a caregiver can take at home.  For the youngest and highest-risk infants, sterile liquid formula, and reconstitution of powder with water heated to at least 158° F (70° C), reduce the risk of other powdered-formula pathogens, although heat at that level does not reliably destroyC. botulinum spores.

          Wound and Iatrogenic Botulism.

          Wound botulism is prevented chiefly by avoiding injection drug use—particularly the injecting or “skin-popping” of black-tar heroin—and by the prompt, proper cleaning of significant wounds.  Iatrogenic botulism, caused by an excessive dose of therapeutic or cosmetic botulinum toxin, is prevented by ensuring that injections are administered only by appropriately licensed and trained providers using approved products at approved doses.[77]

          Early Recognition and Reporting.

          Finally, early recognition is itself a form of prevention.  Because antitoxin is most effective when it is given before paralysis is complete, and because a single case may signal a contaminated commercial product still on store shelves, clinicians are urged to treat suspected botulism as both a medical and a public-health emergency and to report it immediately to state health authorities and the CDC.  Prompt reporting speeds treatment for the individual patient and can prevent further cases by triggering recalls and outbreak investigations.


          [1]           See J. Sobel, et al., Foodborne Botulism in the United States, 1990-2000, Emerging Infectious Diseases, Vol. 10, No. 9, at 1606 (Sept. 2004).

          [2]           James M. Jay, MODERN FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 466 (6th Ed. 2000)

          [3]           Id. at 469-71; see also Sobel, supra note 1, at 1606.

          [4]           Sobel, supra note 1, at 1606.

          [5]           Id.

          [6]           Jin, J. (2023). What is botulism? Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), 330(1), 90-90. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/issue/330/1

          [7]           Jay, supra note 2, at 467-69.  See also, generally H. Houschild, Clostridium Botulinum, in FOODBORNE BACTERIAL PATHOGENS, at 112-89 (M. Doyle Ed. 1989)

          [8]           Jay, supra note 2, at 467-69.  

          [9]           Sobel, supra note 1, at 1607-09; Jay, supra note 2, at 472-76.

          [10]         Sobel, supra note 1, at 1606-07 (also noting that the CDC maintains a 24-hour clinical consultation and emergency antitoxin release service).

          [11]         Jay, supra note 2, at 474.

          [12]         With botulism, the broader term “event” is used to encompass both outbreaks—i.e., two or more cases of botulism caused by a common-source, as well as individual (or sporadic) cases. 

          [13]         Sobel, supra note 1, at 1610; Jay, supra note 2, at 474.

          [14]         Id.

          [15]         Dabritz, H. A., Chung, C. H., Read, J. S., & Khouri, J. M. (2025). Global occurrence of infant botulism: 2007–2021. Pediatrics, 155(4), e2024068791.

          [16]         Harris, R. A., & Dabritz, H. A. (2024). Infant botulism: in search of Clostridium botulinum spores. Current Microbiology, 81(10), 306. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00284-024-03828-0

          [17]         Schneider, K. R., Schneider, R. M. G., Kurdmongkoltham, P., & Bertoldi, B. (2025). Preventing foodborne illness: Clostridium botulinum. https://ask.ifas.ufl.edu/publication/FS104

          [18]         Harris, R. A., & Dabritz, H. A. (2024). Infant botulism: in search of Clostridium botulinum spores. Current Microbiology, 81(10), 306. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00284-024-03828-0

          [19]         CDC. Clinical Overview of Infant Botulism. April 24, 2024. https://www.cdc.gov/botulism/hcp/clinical-overview/infant-botulism.html

          [20]         Rao AK, Sobel J, Chatham-Stephens K, Luquez C. (2021). Clinical Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of Botulism. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2021;70(2):1-30. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/rr/rr7002a1.htm

          [21]         CDC. Clinical Overview of Infant Botulism. April 24, 2024. https://www.cdc.gov/botulism/hcp/clinical-overview/infant-botulism.html

          [22]         Rosow LK, Strober JB. Infant Botulism: Review and Clinical Update. Pediatr Neurol. 2015;52(5):487-492. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10332751/

          [23]         American Academy of Pediatrics, supra note 3; CDC, National Botulism Surveillance Summary, 2021, https://www.cdc.gov/botulism/php/national-botulism-surveillance/2021.html.

          [24]         American Academy of Pediatrics, supra note 3; American Family Physician (AAFP), Infant Botulism, https://www.aafp.org/pubs/afp/issues/2002/0401/p1388.html.

          [25]         Thomas P. Bleck, Clostridium botulinum (Botulism), in MANDELL, DOUGLAS AND BENNETT’S PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE OF INFECTIOUS DISEASE 2543, 2544 (5th ed. 2000). 

          [26]         Id.; Sobel, supra note 1, at 1606.

          [27]         Bleck, supra note 25, at 2545; see also BOTULISM FACT SHEET, National Agricultural Bio-Security Center, Kansas State University, online at http://nabc.ksu.edu/content/factsheets/category/Botulism#f26

          [28]         Bleck, supra note 25, at 2545; Sobel, supra note 1, at 1606.

          [29]         Sobel, supra note 1, at 1606; Jay, supra note 2, at 474.

          [30]         Sobel, supra note 1, at 1606.

          [31]         Jay, supra note 2, at 474.

          [32]         Id.

          [33]         R. Shapiro, et al., Botulism in the United States: A Clinical and Epidemiologic Review, Ann. Intern. Med. 1998; 129:221-28.

          [34]         Jay, supra note 2, at 474.

          [35]         CDC. Clinical Overview of Infant Botulism. April 24, 2024. https://www.cdc.gov/botulism/hcp/clinical-overview/infant-botulism.html

          [36]         Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, supra note 2; Merck Manual, supra note 1.

          [37]         Rao AK, Sobel J, Chatham-Stephens K, Luquez C. Clinical Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of Botulism, 2021. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2021;70(2):1-30. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/rr/rr7002a1.htm

          [38]         Jeffery IA, Nguyen AD, Karim S. Botulism. [Updated 2024 Nov 25]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2026 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK459273/

          [39]         Bleck, supra note 25, at 2546 (noting that “botulism has a limited differential diagnosis”).

          [40]         Sobel, supra note 1, at 1607; see also FDA/CFSAN Bad Bug Book, Clostridium Botulinum, available at http://vm.cfsan.fda.gov/~mow/chap2.html

          [41]         Id.

          [42]         Bleck, supra note 25, at 2546.  See also, e.g., MMWWR, supra note 1, at 2 (“CDC detected botulinum toxin Type A by mouse bioassay in the man’s serum sample”).

          [43]         Bad Bug Book, supra note 40.

          [44]         Sobel, supra note 1, at 1606; Shapiro, supra note 33, at 223.

          [45]         Rao AK, Sobel J, Chatham-Stephens K, Luquez C. Clinical Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of Botulism, 2021. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2021;70(2):1-30. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/rr/rr7002a1.htm

          [46]         CDC. Clinical Overview of Infant Botulism. April 24, 2024. https://www.cdc.gov/botulism/hcp/clinical-overview/infant-botulism.html

          [47]         CDC. Investigation Update: Infant Botulism Outbreak, November 2025. March 4, 2026. https://www.cdc.gov/botulism/outbreaks-investigations/infant-formula-nov-2025/investigation.html

          [48]         FDA. Outbreak Investigation of Infant Botulism: Infant Formula (November 2025). Content current as of June 3, 2026. https://www.fda.gov/food/outbreaks-foodborne-illness/outbreak-investigation-infant-botulism-infant-formula-november-2025

          [49]         Jay, supra note 2, at 474; Sobel, supra note 1, at 1606.

          [50]         Id.; Bleck, supra note 25, at 2546-67.

          [51]         Sobel, supra note 1, at 1606.

          [52]         Jeffery IA, Nguyen AD, Karim S. Botulism. [Updated 2024 Nov 25]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2026 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK459273/

          [53]         CDC. Clinical Overview of Infant Botulism. April 24, 2024. https://www.cdc.gov/botulism/hcp/clinical-overview/infant-botulism.html

          [54]         Scarborough, A. P., Khouri, J. M., Chung, C. H., Dabritz, H. A., & Read, J. S. (2025). International Experience with Human Botulism Immune Globulin for the Treatment of Infant Botulism. Medical Research Archives, 13(10). https://esmed.org/MRA/mra/article/view/7026

          [55]         Scarborough, A. P., Khouri, J. M., Chung, C. H., Dabritz, H. A., & Read, J. S. (2025). International Experience with Human Botulism Immune Globulin for the Treatment of Infant Botulism. Medical Research Archives, 13(10). https://esmed.org/MRA/mra/article/view/7026

          [56]         Rao AK, Sobel J, Chatham-Stephens K, Luquez C. Clinical Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of Botulism, 2021. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2021;70(2):1-30. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/rr/rr7002a1.htm

          [57]         Jeffery IA, Nguyen AD, Karim S. Botulism. [Updated 2024 Nov 25]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2026 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK459273/

          [58]         Scarborough, A. P., Khouri, J. M., Chung, C. H., Dabritz, H. A., & Read, J. S. (2025). International Experience with Human Botulism Immune Globulin for the Treatment of Infant Botulism. Medical Research Archives, 13(10). https://esmed.org/MRA/mra/article/view/7026

          [59]         Bleck, supra note 25, at 2547. See also P. Wilcox, et al., Recovery of Ventilatory and Upper Airway Muscles and Exercise Performance After Type-A Botulism, Chest, 98:620-26 (1990); J. Mann, et al., Patient Recovery From Type-A Botulism: Morbidity Assessment Following a Large Outbreak, Am. J. Public Health, 71 (3):266-69 (Mar. 1981).

          [60]         Id.

          [61]         Bleck, supra note 25, at 2547. See also F. Cohen, et al., Physical and Psychosocial Health Status 3 Years After Catastrophic Illness—Botulism, Issues Mental Health Nurs., 9:387098 (1988)

          [62]         S. Gottlieb, et al., Long-Term Outcomes of 217 Botulism Cases in the Republic of Georgia, Clin. Infectious Disease, 45: 174-80, at 180 (220&).

          [63]         Id. at 179.

          [64]         Scarborough, A. P., Khouri, J. M., Chung, C. H., Dabritz, H. A., & Read, J. S. (2025). International Experience with Human Botulism Immune Globulin for the Treatment of Infant Botulism. Medical Research Archives, 13(10). https://esmed.org/MRA/mra/article/view/7026

          [65]         Morris, V., Wians, R., Wilson, J., & Stevens, G. (2022). Infant Botulism. Journal of Education & Teaching in Emergency Medicine, 7(2), S48. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10332751/

          [66]         Public Health Agency of Canada, supra note 6.

          [67]         Scarborough, A. P., Khouri, J. M., Chung, C. H., Dabritz, H. A., & Read, J. S. (2025). International Experience with Human Botulism Immune Globulin for the Treatment of Infant Botulism. Medical Research Archives, 13(10). https://esmed.org/MRA/mra/article/view/7026

          [68]         CDC EIS Conference. Severity of Illness and Clinical Outcomes of Infants Linked to an Infant Botulism Outbreak Caused by Powdered Infant Formula — United States, 2025. April 17, 2026. https://www.cdc.gov/eis-conference/php/abstracts/infant-botulism-outbreak-caused-by-powdered-infant-formula.html

          [69]         AAFP, supra note 5; Public Health Agency of Canada, supra note 6; Botulism Sequelae: A Systematic Review, PMC, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12798721/.

          [70]         Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Botulism Prevention, https://www.cdc.gov/botulism/prevention/index.html.

          [71]         U.S. Department of Agriculture, Complete Guide to Home Canning (rev. 2015) (Agric. Info. Bull. No. 539); National Center for Home Food Preservation, University of Georgia.  Pressure canning is the only USDA-recommended method for low-acid foods because it alone reaches 240° F, the temperature at which C. botulinumspores are reliably destroyed.

          [72]         CDC, Botulism Prevention, supra note 70.

          [73]         21 C.F.R. pts. 113–114 (thermal processing of low-acid foods packaged in hermetically sealed containers; acidified foods).

          [74]         CDC, Foods and Drinks to Avoid or Limit, Infant and Toddler Nutrition, https://www.cdc.gov/infant-toddler-nutrition/foods-and-drinks/foods-and-drinks-to-avoid-or-limit.html; American Academy of Pediatrics (advising against honey before twelve months of age).

          [75]         California Department of Public Health, Infant Botulism Treatment and Prevention Program, When to Avoid Honey, https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/cls/idld/ibtpp/Pages/When-to-Avoid-Honey.aspx (describing honey as the one identified and avoidable food reservoir of C. botulinum, while noting that most cases today are not honey-related and that the toxin is not transmitted in breast milk).

          [76]         U.S. Food & Drug Administration, FDA’s Actions to Respond to Clostridium botulinum Illnesses Associated with Consumption of Powdered Infant Formula (2026), https://www.fda.gov/food/outbreaks-foodborne-illness/fdas-actions-respond-clostridium-botulinum-illnesses-associated-consumption-powdered-infant-formula.

          [77]         CDC, Botulism Prevention, supra note 70.

          Nara Organics Powdered Infant Formula was distributed nationally across Target retail stores, Target.com, and Nara.com between July 2025 and June 2026. Nara Infant Formula is not distributed outside of the USA.

          The FDA and CDC, in collaboration with the California Department of Public Health (CDPH), Infant Botulism Treatment and Prevention Program (IBTPP), and state and local partners, are investigating a multistate outbreak of three confirmed or suspected infant botulism illnesses from three states: California, Pennsylvania, and Washington. The CDPH IBTPP reported three toxin type A infections among infants consuming Nara Organics Whole Milk Organic Powdered Infant Formula with illness onset between April and May 2026. All three cases included in this outbreak consumed Nara Organics-brand powdered infant formula. Officials in two states have collected leftover infant formula for testing. This testing is underway, and results are expected in the coming weeks. 

          FDA contacted the firm and recommended that the firm conduct a recall due to the severity of illnesses and the epidemiological signal. On June 13, 2026, Nara Organics agreed to recall all of their Nara Organics brand Whole Milk Organic Powdered Infant Formula. All of Nara Organics’ formula was manufactured in Europe. Consumers should not use recalled infant formula. 

          FDA’s investigation is ongoing. This advisory will be updated as information becomes available. For more information about FDA’s ongoing efforts to ensure the safety of infant formula please see FDA’s Clostridium botulinum Illnesses Associated with Consumption of Powdered Infant Formula webpage.  

          Affected Formula

          All cans of Nara Organics Infant Formula are being voluntarily recalled. Stop using all Nara formula immediately.  The three specific product lots these infants were exposed to are: 709125280E14F2, 709125288E14F2, 708125174E14F2.

          All Recalled Lot Codes

          • 408125075E14F2
          • 708125076E14F2
          • 708125083E14F2
          • 408125139E14F2
          • 708125141E14F2
          • 708125145E14F2
          • 708125174E14F2
          • 709125273E14F2
          • 709125280E14F2
          • 709125288E14F2
          • 409125307E14F2
          • 70926019ENNB
          • 70926029ENNB
          • 70926035ENNB
          • 70926039ENNB
          • 70926042ENNB

          The FDA and CDC, in collaboration with the California Department of Public Health (CDPH), Infant Botulism Treatment and Prevention Program (IBTPP), and other state and local partners, continue to investigate a multistate outbreak of infant botulism. Epidemiologic and laboratory analyses indicate that ByHeart Whole Nutrition infant formula is the source of this multistate outbreak of infant botulism.

          Since the last update on December 10, 2025, reports of cases linked to this outbreak have slowed, and public health officials have not added any new cases to this investigation. Going forward, instead of weekly updates, CDC will provide updates on this outbreak investigation when new information becomes available. FDA will continue to provide investigational updates as needed.

          All ByHeart infant formula products have been recalled, and these products should not be available for sale in stores or online. This includes all formula cans and single-serve “anywhere pack” sticks. On December 12, 2025, FDA sent warning letters to four major retailers for failing to remove recalled ByHeart infant formula from their store shelves despite being notified of the recall. On December 15, 2025, FDA issued a press releaseand reminded industry about its legal duties regarding food recalls under the Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act. FDA asked companies to follow best practices when carrying out recalls. This is especially important for recalls involving foods for infants and young children, who are among our most vulnerable populations.

          Additional testing by ByHeart, FDA, CDC, and state partners is underway, and results are expected in the coming weeks. Positive sample results for finished product testing will be included and updated in the Sample Results section below.

          FDA’s investigation is ongoing to determine the point of contamination. This advisory will be updated as information becomes available.


          Case Count Map Provided by CDC

          CDC case count map with cases in Arizona, California, Idaho, Illinois, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, North Carolina, New Jersey, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Road Island, Texas, Virgina, Washington, Wyoming

          Case Counts

          Total Illnesses: 51 
          Hospitalizations: 51
          Deaths: 0
          Last Illness Onset: December 1, 2025
          States with Cases: AZ, CA, ID, IL, KY, MA, ME, MI, MN, NC, NJ, OH, OR, PA, RI, TX, VA, WA, WI
          Product Distribution: Online and nationwide (including Guam and Puerto Rico), and internationally

          Useful Links

          States with illnesses: Arizona 5, California 12, Idaho 2, Illinois 2, Kentucky 1, Massachusetts 2, Maine 1, Michigan 1, Minnesota 3, North Carolina 2, New Jersey 1, Ohio 1, Oregon 4, Pennsylvania 1, Rhode Island 1, Texas 8, Virginia 1, Washington 2 and Wisconsin 1. 

          Illnesses occurred from December 2023 through December 2025.

          ByHeart infant formula was distributed to Argentina, Brazil, Brunei, Canada, Chile, China, Colombia, Ecuador, Egypt, Hong Kong, Israel, Jamaica, Japan, Republic of Korea, Peru, Philippines, Romania, Singapore, South Africa, Thailand, and the British Virgin Islands.

          CDC case count map with cases in Arizona, California, Idaho, Illinois, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, North Carolina, New Jersey, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Road Island, Texas, Virgina, Washington, Wyoming

          The FDA and CDC, in collaboration with the California Department of Public Health (CDPH), Infant Botulism Treatment and Prevention Program (IBTPP), and other state and local partners, continue to investigate a multistate outbreak of infant botulism. Epidemiologic and laboratory data show that ByHeart Whole Nutrition infant formula is contaminated with Clostridium botulinum, which is causing infant illness in multiple regions of the country.

          ByHeart’s and FDA’s investigations into the root cause of the outbreak are ongoing, and at this time, FDA cannot rule out the possibility that contamination might have affected all ByHeart formula products. In response, CDC broadened the case definition to include any infant with botulism who was exposed to ByHeart formula at any time since the product’s release in March 2022. As of December 10, 2025, a total of 51 infants with suspected or confirmed infant botulism and confirmed exposure to ByHeart Whole Nutrition infant formula (various lots) have been reported from 19 states. 

          Previously, case counts included illnesses from August 1, 2025, onward. With the expanded definition, CDC and state partners identified 10 additional cases that occurred from December 2023 through July 2025. At this time, no cases have been identified between March 2022 and December 2023. All 10 are confirmed infant botulism cases with documented exposure to ByHeart formula.

          Laboratory confirmation for some cases is ongoing. Illnesses started on dates ranging from December 24, 2023 to December 1, 2025. All 51 infants were hospitalized. No deaths have been reported to date. The infants range in age from 16 to 264 days and 22 (43%) are female. 

          State and local public health officials are interviewing caregivers about the foods the infants were fed in the month before they got sick. Fifty-one infants have been identified that were fed ByHeart Whole Nutrition powdered infant formula before getting sick.

          FDA has not received reports of recalled formula being found on store shelves since November 26, 2025. All ByHeart infant formula products have been recalled, and these products should not be available for sale in stores or online. This includes all formula cans and single-serve “anywhere pack” sticks.

          Additional testing by ByHeart, FDA, CDC, and state partners is underway, and results are expected in the coming weeks. Positive sample results for finished product testing will be included and updated in the Sample Results section.

          FDA’s investigation is ongoing to determine the point of contamination. This advisory will be updated as information becomes available. 

          Product sampling and testing is being conducted by FDA, CDC, state partners, and ByHeart. Available information on positive samples is included below. This table will be updated as additional results become available or are shared with FDA.

          Due to the large number of samples, only positive results are being reported here. The detection of Clostridium botulinum in infant formula is complex, and a negative test result does not rule out the presence of the bacteria in the product.

          Parents and caregivers should not use any ByHeart infant formula, regardless of test results.

          Sample Collected/Analyzed byProduct Test ResultToxin Type
          CDPHOpened container of ByHeart Infant Formula (Batch No. 251131P2)PositiveType A
          ByHeartByHeart Infant Formula (Batch/Batches Not Reported)PositiveType A
          ByHeartByHeart Infant Formula (Batch/Batches Not Reported)PositiveType A
          ByHeartByHeart Infant Formula (Batch/Batches Not Reported)PositiveType A
          ByHeartByHeart Infant Formula (Batch/Batches Not Reported)PositiveType A
          ByHeartByHeart Infant Formula (Batch/Batches Not Reported)PositiveType A

          The FDA and CDC, in collaboration with the California Department of Public Health (CDPH), Infant Botulism Treatment and Prevention Program (IBTPP), and other state and local partners, continue to investigate a multistate outbreak of infant botulism. Epidemiologic and laboratory data show that ByHeart Whole Nutrition infant formula might be contaminated with Clostridium botulinum, which is causing infant illness in multiple regions of the country.

          Since the last update on November 11, 2025, nine new cases and one new state (Michigan) have been added to this investigation. All 9 cases were hospitalized and treated with BabyBIG®. 

          As of November 14, 2025, this outbreak includes 24 infants with suspected or confirmed infant botulism from 13 states – Arizona 3, California 3, Illinois 2, Kentucky 1, Michigan 1, Minnesota 2, North Carolina 2, New Jersey 1, Oregon 2, Pennsylvania 1, Rhode Island 1, Texas 3, Washington 2.

          Laboratory confirmation for some cases is ongoing. For 22 cases with illness onset information available, illnesses started on dates ranging from August 9 to November 11, 2025 All 23 infants were hospitalized and treated with BabyBIG®. No deaths have been reported. For 22 infants with age and sex information available, they range in age from 16 to 200 days and 10 (45%) are female.

          As part of this investigation, officials in several states have collected leftover infant formula for testing. On November 8, 2025, preliminary laboratory results reported by the California Department of Public Health suggest the presence of the bacteria that produce botulinum toxin in an open can of ByHeart infant formula (lot 206VABP/251131P2) that was fed to an infant with infant botulism.  Additional testing is underway, and results are expected in the coming weeks. Detection of Clostridium botulinum in infant formula is difficult, and a negative test result does not rule out the presence of the bacteria in the product.  

          Epidemiologic data

          The FDA and CDC, in collaboration with California Department of Public Health (CDPH), Infant Botulism Treatment and Prevention Program (IBTPP), and state and local partners, are investigating a multistate outbreak of 13 infant botulism illnesses from 10 states: Arizona, California (2), Illinois (2), Minnesota, New Jersey, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Texas (2), Washington.

          Laboratory confirmation for some cases is ongoing. There are no deaths reported at this time. The CDPH IBTPP reported an increase in number of botulism type A infections among infants consuming ByHeart powdered infant formula from August 2025 to November 2025.

          All 13 cases included in this outbreak are reported to have consumed ByHeart-brand powdered infant formula. Officials in several states have collected leftover infant formula for testing. This testing is underway, and results are not yet available but expected in the coming weeks. 

          State and local public health officials are interviewing caregivers about the foods infants were fed in the month before they got sick. All 13 (100%) reported feeding ByHeart Whole Nutrition infant formula.

          Laboratory and traceback data

          Officials in several states have collected leftover infant formula for testing. This testing is underway, and results are not yet available but expected in the coming weeks.

          Public health actions

          FDA has been in contact with the firm and has recommended the firm conduct a voluntary recall due to the number of cases, severity of illness, and the strong epidemiological signal. Today, ByHeart, Inc. agreed to initiate a recall of the two lots of ByHeart Whole Nutrition infant formula (Lot: 206VABP/251261P2 and Lot: 206VABP/251131P2) that were reported to have been consumed by sick infants. FDA is continuing to work with the firm to ensure all potentially impacted products are removed from the market. FDA’s investigation is ongoing to determine the point of contamination and if any additional products are impacted.

          On November 8, 2025, ByHeart Inc. recalled two lots of Whole Nutrition Infant Formula:
          • Lot: 206VABP/251261P2 (“Use by 01 Dec 2026”)
          • Lot: 206VABP/251131P2 (“Use by 01 Dec 2026”)

          ByHeart Whole Nutrition Infant Formula is available for sale online and at major retailers nationwide.

          KRASNIY OKTYABR INC. USA. of BROOKLYN, NY, is recalling its “ARAL SILVER VOBLA” brand “ARAL”, because the product was found to be uneviscerated.

          The fish were distributed nationwide through retail stores. The product comes in a clear plastic vacuum packaged bag with a blue label, containing two whole fish inside marked “Product of Kazakhstan”.

          The recall was initiated after routine sampling by New York State Department of Agriculture and Markets food inspectors and subsequent analysis by NYS Food Laboratory revealed the product was not properly eviscerated prior to processing.

          The sale of uneviscerated fish is prohibited because clostridium botulinum spores are more likely to be concentrated in the viscera than any other portion of the fish. Uneviscerated fish have been linked to outbreaks of botulism poisoning. Symptoms of botulism include dizziness, blurred or double vision and trouble with speaking or swallowing. Difficulty in breathing, weakness of other muscles, abdominal distension and constipation may also be common symptoms. People experiencing these problems should seek immediate medical attention.

          Walker’s Wine Juice LLC of Forestville, NY is recalling its pumpkin juice because it may be contaminated with BotulismBotulism is a potentially fatal form of food poisoning and can cause the following symptoms: general weakness, dizziness, double-vision, and trouble with speaking or swallowing. Difficulty in breathing, weakness of other muscles, abdominal distension, and constipation may also be common symptoms. People experiencing these problems should seek immediate medical attention.

          Product was distributed via Walker’s Wine Juice retail store in NY. The juice was also distributed directly by Walker’s to a limited number of commercial wineries in the following states: IL, IN, KS, KY, ME, MI, MN, NJ, NY, OH, PA, WI.

          Products can be identified as follows:

          • 2.5-gallon bag in box and 5-gallon hot pack are labeled “pumpkin”; All lots are subject to the recall
          • 30-, 60-, and 275-gallon bulk containers are tagged “pumpkin”; All lots are subject to the recall

          No illnesses have been reported to date.

          The potential contamination was discovered after an inspection by New York State Department of Agriculture and Markets Food Inspectors found that the pumpkin juice pH was too high to be processed per Walker’s “hot fill” schedule process. As a result, it was determined that no adequate kill step was used to address the possibility of microbiological hazards.